<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 735 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161983</link>
    <description>The Court quashed the Principal Commissioner&#039;s order rejecting the petitioner&#039;s request for condonation of delay in payment under the Samadhan Scheme. Emphasizing the absence of a strict time limit for payment under the Scheme, the Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the amount paid to be appropriated under the Scheme and granting the petitioner entitlement to scheme benefits. The Court highlighted the importance of objectively considering delays with valid explanations, ultimately granting the relief sought through the writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 18:52:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 735 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161983</link>
      <description>The Court quashed the Principal Commissioner&#039;s order rejecting the petitioner&#039;s request for condonation of delay in payment under the Samadhan Scheme. Emphasizing the absence of a strict time limit for payment under the Scheme, the Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the amount paid to be appropriated under the Scheme and granting the petitioner entitlement to scheme benefits. The Court highlighted the importance of objectively considering delays with valid explanations, ultimately granting the relief sought through the writ petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>