<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 603 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161981</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ application, holding that the East Central Railway&#039;s catering services qualify as a &quot;dealer&quot; under the Bihar Finance Act, 1981. The goods sold are not exempt from state taxation under Article 285(1) of the Constitution of India as the tax imposed is on the act of sale, deemed an indirect tax and not barred by Article 285(1).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 18:31:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 603 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161981</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ application, holding that the East Central Railway&#039;s catering services qualify as a &quot;dealer&quot; under the Bihar Finance Act, 1981. The goods sold are not exempt from state taxation under Article 285(1) of the Constitution of India as the tax imposed is on the act of sale, deemed an indirect tax and not barred by Article 285(1).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>