<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 529 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243932</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of bulk drugs and intermediaries, regarding the admissibility of CENVAT credit amounting to Rs. 14,13,992/- for 2007-08 and 2008-09. The dispute centered on the usage of certain materials in the construction of a new block. The Tribunal accepted the appellant&#039;s argument that only a portion of the items were used in support structures, justifying the credit availed. Additionally, the Tribunal acknowledged the time-barred nature of the demand, finding merit in the appellant&#039;s case against demands exceeding the normal time limit. As a result, the predeposit requirement for the remaining amount, interest, and penalty was waived, with a stay against recovery granted during the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:40:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 529 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243932</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of bulk drugs and intermediaries, regarding the admissibility of CENVAT credit amounting to Rs. 14,13,992/- for 2007-08 and 2008-09. The dispute centered on the usage of certain materials in the construction of a new block. The Tribunal accepted the appellant&#039;s argument that only a portion of the items were used in support structures, justifying the credit availed. Additionally, the Tribunal acknowledged the time-barred nature of the demand, finding merit in the appellant&#039;s case against demands exceeding the normal time limit. As a result, the predeposit requirement for the remaining amount, interest, and penalty was waived, with a stay against recovery granted during the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>