<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 502 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243905</link>
    <description>The Tribunal waived the pre-deposit of penalties imposed on a manufacturing company and individuals under Rule 25 and Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, totaling Rs.18.00 crores. The penalties arose from non-clearance of goods despite duty payment due to order cancellations. The Tribunal found that the duty was paid twice for the same goods, leading to a refund application initially rejected but later allowed on appeal by the Commissioner. The Tribunal noted the meticulous record-keeping of raw materials, production, and clearance processes by the applicant, justifying the waiver of penalties and staying recovery during the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2014 10:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 502 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243905</link>
      <description>The Tribunal waived the pre-deposit of penalties imposed on a manufacturing company and individuals under Rule 25 and Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, totaling Rs.18.00 crores. The penalties arose from non-clearance of goods despite duty payment due to order cancellations. The Tribunal found that the duty was paid twice for the same goods, leading to a refund application initially rejected but later allowed on appeal by the Commissioner. The Tribunal noted the meticulous record-keeping of raw materials, production, and clearance processes by the applicant, justifying the waiver of penalties and staying recovery during the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243905</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>