<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 662 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161973</link>
    <description>A best judgment assessment cannot be sustained where the authority relies on materials collected behind the assessee&#039;s back and fails to furnish those documents before finalisation. The assessee was entitled to copies of the duplicate delivery notes and N forms used against it, and the denial of those materials, along with an ineffective opportunity to object and be heard, breached statutory fair procedure and natural justice. Cross-examination of the officers was not required on the facts, but disclosure of the relied-upon documents was mandatory. The assessment orders were quashed and the matter was remitted for fresh assessment after supply of the documents and a meaningful hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 16:19:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 662 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161973</link>
      <description>A best judgment assessment cannot be sustained where the authority relies on materials collected behind the assessee&#039;s back and fails to furnish those documents before finalisation. The assessee was entitled to copies of the duplicate delivery notes and N forms used against it, and the denial of those materials, along with an ineffective opportunity to object and be heard, breached statutory fair procedure and natural justice. Cross-examination of the officers was not required on the facts, but disclosure of the relied-upon documents was mandatory. The assessment orders were quashed and the matter was remitted for fresh assessment after supply of the documents and a meaningful hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>