<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 491 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243894</link>
    <description>The court quashed the impugned order, set aside the confiscation and penalty, and allowed the writ petition. The respondents were directed to appropriate the duty paid by the petitioners and permitted to claim interest. The security provided by the petitioners was discharged, and the rule was made absolute with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 14:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345719" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 491 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243894</link>
      <description>The court quashed the impugned order, set aside the confiscation and penalty, and allowed the writ petition. The respondents were directed to appropriate the duty paid by the petitioners and permitted to claim interest. The security provided by the petitioners was discharged, and the rule was made absolute with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243894</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>