<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 723 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161946</link>
    <description>Amended pre-deposit requirements for tax appeals were held not to apply retrospectively to returns filed before the amendment. The court treated the right of appeal as a vested right accruing when the lis commenced, and in tax matters that point arose when the return was filed or was due to be filed. Because the amendment introducing a mandatory twenty-five per cent pre-deposit contained no express or necessary retrospective effect, the pre-amendment regime continued to govern. Section 4 of the Punjab General Clauses Act, 1898 preserved the accrued right and the corresponding obligation under the old law, so the insistence on the amended pre-deposit was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:30:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 723 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161946</link>
      <description>Amended pre-deposit requirements for tax appeals were held not to apply retrospectively to returns filed before the amendment. The court treated the right of appeal as a vested right accruing when the lis commenced, and in tax matters that point arose when the return was filed or was due to be filed. Because the amendment introducing a mandatory twenty-five per cent pre-deposit contained no express or necessary retrospective effect, the pre-amendment regime continued to govern. Section 4 of the Punjab General Clauses Act, 1898 preserved the accrued right and the corresponding obligation under the old law, so the insistence on the amended pre-deposit was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>