<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 568 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161940</link>
    <description>An assessment order passed during the subsistence of an interim restraint order was treated as unsustainable in law and set aside. The respondents accepted that the order could not stand and undertook to proceed afresh after issuing notice, considering the reply, granting a personal hearing, and taking judicial pronouncements into account. The matter was remitted for fresh decision in accordance with law, while the underlying taxability controversy was left open for adjudication on merits. The operative effect was annulment of the impugned assessment and a direction to decide the issue again after observance of due process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 16:44:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 568 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161940</link>
      <description>An assessment order passed during the subsistence of an interim restraint order was treated as unsustainable in law and set aside. The respondents accepted that the order could not stand and undertook to proceed afresh after issuing notice, considering the reply, granting a personal hearing, and taking judicial pronouncements into account. The matter was remitted for fresh decision in accordance with law, while the underlying taxability controversy was left open for adjudication on merits. The operative effect was annulment of the impugned assessment and a direction to decide the issue again after observance of due process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>