<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 542 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161923</link>
    <description>A dealer&#039;s challenge to reduction of taxable turnover failed because the Tribunal&#039;s finding was factual and no error was shown. Tax was also held not leviable under section 3-AAAA on old broken glass pieces purchased as input for manufacturing hand-made glass phials and bottles, since the material was not waste or discarded goods in the purchaser&#039;s hands. The Tribunal&#039;s order was therefore left undisturbed, and the revision failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:08:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 542 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161923</link>
      <description>A dealer&#039;s challenge to reduction of taxable turnover failed because the Tribunal&#039;s finding was factual and no error was shown. Tax was also held not leviable under section 3-AAAA on old broken glass pieces purchased as input for manufacturing hand-made glass phials and bottles, since the material was not waste or discarded goods in the purchaser&#039;s hands. The Tribunal&#039;s order was therefore left undisturbed, and the revision failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>