<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 485 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243888</link>
    <description>The court found discrepancies in the appellant&#039;s tax payments for Maintenance and Repair Services, leading to a demand of Rs.5,71,328/- with interest and penalties. The appeal focused on a disputed tax amount of Rs.51,054/-, citing reasons such as discrepancies in income tax returns and gross total receipts. The judge considered the arguments and reduced the disputed tax amount to Rs.3189/- based on a reconciliation report, setting aside the demand for differential duty. Penalties under sections 77 and 78 were addressed, with the court waiving the penalty under section 78 but upholding a Rs.5000/- penalty under section 77 for delayed registration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2014 14:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 485 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243888</link>
      <description>The court found discrepancies in the appellant&#039;s tax payments for Maintenance and Repair Services, leading to a demand of Rs.5,71,328/- with interest and penalties. The appeal focused on a disputed tax amount of Rs.51,054/-, citing reasons such as discrepancies in income tax returns and gross total receipts. The judge considered the arguments and reduced the disputed tax amount to Rs.3189/- based on a reconciliation report, setting aside the demand for differential duty. Penalties under sections 77 and 78 were addressed, with the court waiving the penalty under section 78 but upholding a Rs.5000/- penalty under section 77 for delayed registration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>