https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243885 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, restricting the demand on both issues to the normal period of limitation. The penalty imposed was set aside, and the adjudicating authority was directed to quantify the amount accordingly. The appellant's claim for Cenvat credit on transportation of inputs and goods from job worker to depot was denied as they were not considered the manufacturer. However, the credit for transportation of goods from depot to dealers was allowed based on the interpretation of the term "clearance of final products from the place of removal." en-us Fri, 24 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Jul 2015 12:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243885 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, restricting the demand on both issues to the normal period of limitation. The penalty imposed was set aside, and the adjudicating authority was directed to quantify the amount accordingly. The appellant's claim for Cenvat credit on transportation of inputs and goods from job worker to depot was denied as they were not considered the manufacturer. However, the credit for transportation of goods from depot to dealers was allowed based on the interpretation of the term "clearance of final products from the place of removal." Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 24 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243885