<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 477 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243880</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery to the appellants regarding adjudged dues related to GTA service. The decision hinged on whether inward and outward freight charges paid to truck owners should be included in the taxable value of GTA service and the distinction between individuals owning trucks and registered goods transport agencies. The Tribunal&#039;s ruling was influenced by previous orders and the absence of a stay on its decision in a similar case pending before the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 15:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 477 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243880</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery to the appellants regarding adjudged dues related to GTA service. The decision hinged on whether inward and outward freight charges paid to truck owners should be included in the taxable value of GTA service and the distinction between individuals owning trucks and registered goods transport agencies. The Tribunal&#039;s ruling was influenced by previous orders and the absence of a stay on its decision in a similar case pending before the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>