<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 476 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243879</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals in part, deleting the penalties for both assessment years, as the issue of depreciation claim was debatable and made in good faith. The Tribunal rejected the ground concerning the penalty order being barred by limitation due to lack of submissions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 15:16:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 476 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243879</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals in part, deleting the penalties for both assessment years, as the issue of depreciation claim was debatable and made in good faith. The Tribunal rejected the ground concerning the penalty order being barred by limitation due to lack of submissions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>