<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 451 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243854</link>
    <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the appellant&#039;s position in a case involving central excise duty non-payment and Cenvat credit utilization. The appellant&#039;s failure to pay duty beyond thirty days led to goods being cleared without payment. Despite penalty imposition initially, the Commissioner (Appeals) ruled in favor of the appellant, citing relevant case law precedent. Emphasizing adherence to Rule 8 and timely duty payment, the decision highlighted that once outstanding amounts are settled, the prohibition on credit utilization lifts. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected, affirming the appellant&#039;s position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:49:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 451 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243854</link>
      <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the appellant&#039;s position in a case involving central excise duty non-payment and Cenvat credit utilization. The appellant&#039;s failure to pay duty beyond thirty days led to goods being cleared without payment. Despite penalty imposition initially, the Commissioner (Appeals) ruled in favor of the appellant, citing relevant case law precedent. Emphasizing adherence to Rule 8 and timely duty payment, the decision highlighted that once outstanding amounts are settled, the prohibition on credit utilization lifts. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected, affirming the appellant&#039;s position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>