https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243853 The court set aside the order confirming a demand for short payment of duty under Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, amounting to Rs.10/-. Despite the miscalculation, the appellants rectified the shortfall promptly, leading the court to find the impugned proceedings unjustified. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the importance of accurate duty payment and acknowledging the rectification efforts of the appellants. The decision reflects a balanced approach, considering the factual circumstances and prompt rectification, ultimately resulting in the dismissal of the demand confirmation and disposal of the stay application. en-us Thu, 09 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Feb 2016 15:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243853 The court set aside the order confirming a demand for short payment of duty under Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, amounting to Rs.10/-. Despite the miscalculation, the appellants rectified the shortfall promptly, leading the court to find the impugned proceedings unjustified. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the importance of accurate duty payment and acknowledging the rectification efforts of the appellants. The decision reflects a balanced approach, considering the factual circumstances and prompt rectification, ultimately resulting in the dismissal of the demand confirmation and disposal of the stay application. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 09 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243853