<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 447 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243850</link>
    <description>Under the Modvat scheme, credit was available only for inputs genuinely intended to be used in the declared final product, and the declaration had to identify those inputs with specificity. Since the evidence showed that only Grade 5702 polyurethane resin was actually used in the lacquer based synthetic polymer, and the officers&#039; statements did not show a real intention to use the other grades, credit on those other grades was not admissible. A mere possibility, desire, or speculative future use could not satisfy the statutory requirement of intention to use, so the Revenue&#039;s position was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:30:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 447 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243850</link>
      <description>Under the Modvat scheme, credit was available only for inputs genuinely intended to be used in the declared final product, and the declaration had to identify those inputs with specificity. Since the evidence showed that only Grade 5702 polyurethane resin was actually used in the lacquer based synthetic polymer, and the officers&#039; statements did not show a real intention to use the other grades, credit on those other grades was not admissible. A mere possibility, desire, or speculative future use could not satisfy the statutory requirement of intention to use, so the Revenue&#039;s position was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>