<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 613 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161908</link>
    <description>Amounts collected from customers in excess, or purportedly by way of tax, are prohibited under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 even if described as service charges, handling charges, incidental charges, or recoupment of sales tax. The operative test is the substance of the collection, not its label; if the dealer collects money without authority in a tax-like manner, the collection falls within the mischief of the provision and attracts penalty under section 22(2).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2014 18:19:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 613 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161908</link>
      <description>Amounts collected from customers in excess, or purportedly by way of tax, are prohibited under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 even if described as service charges, handling charges, incidental charges, or recoupment of sales tax. The operative test is the substance of the collection, not its label; if the dealer collects money without authority in a tax-like manner, the collection falls within the mischief of the provision and attracts penalty under section 22(2).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>