<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 722 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161883</link>
    <description>The court emphasized the importance of deciding stay applications before appeals on merits, highlighting the right of parties to seek stay pending their case. It stressed expeditious decision-making and declined to interfere in assessment orders, directing authorities to handle issues lawfully. The judgment disposed of the petition, signaling closure and the need for prompt provision of certified copies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:23:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 722 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161883</link>
      <description>The court emphasized the importance of deciding stay applications before appeals on merits, highlighting the right of parties to seek stay pending their case. It stressed expeditious decision-making and declined to interfere in assessment orders, directing authorities to handle issues lawfully. The judgment disposed of the petition, signaling closure and the need for prompt provision of certified copies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>