<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 439 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243842</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, determining that the services provided by the respondent to foreign principals constituted export of services under the Export of Service Rules, 2005. The Tribunal found that the services met the criteria of being used outside India for business purposes, with payment received in convertible foreign exchange. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as the conditions for export of service were satisfied, supported by Foreign Exchange Remittance Certificates.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 439 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243842</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, determining that the services provided by the respondent to foreign principals constituted export of services under the Export of Service Rules, 2005. The Tribunal found that the services met the criteria of being used outside India for business purposes, with payment received in convertible foreign exchange. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as the conditions for export of service were satisfied, supported by Foreign Exchange Remittance Certificates.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>