<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 438 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243841</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for de novo adjudication, emphasizing the need for thorough verification of refunds, proper procedural compliance, and cooperation between the parties. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, and the stay petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 08:37:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 438 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243841</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for de novo adjudication, emphasizing the need for thorough verification of refunds, proper procedural compliance, and cooperation between the parties. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, and the stay petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>