<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 426 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243829</link>
    <description>The Tribunal justified its decision by stating that the case laws were considered but deemed irrelevant to the specific facts of the case. It emphasized the duty to record reasons for decisions and clarified that only relevant case laws with a nexus to the issue need to be discussed. The Tribunal upheld its original conclusions, dismissing all petitions filed by the assessee based on detailed justifications and analysis provided in the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 06:33:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 426 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243829</link>
      <description>The Tribunal justified its decision by stating that the case laws were considered but deemed irrelevant to the specific facts of the case. It emphasized the duty to record reasons for decisions and clarified that only relevant case laws with a nexus to the issue need to be discussed. The Tribunal upheld its original conclusions, dismissing all petitions filed by the assessee based on detailed justifications and analysis provided in the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>