<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 424 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243827</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed based on the valuation of the property for calculating capital gains. The appellant&#039;s plea was accepted, directing the Assessing Officer to adopt the fair market value at Rs. 6,25,590 as of 01.04.1981 and recalculate the capital gain with necessary indexation. The order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was set aside for consistency with a decision in a coowner&#039;s case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 08:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 424 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243827</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed based on the valuation of the property for calculating capital gains. The appellant&#039;s plea was accepted, directing the Assessing Officer to adopt the fair market value at Rs. 6,25,590 as of 01.04.1981 and recalculate the capital gain with necessary indexation. The order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was set aside for consistency with a decision in a coowner&#039;s case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>