<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 413 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243816</link>
    <description>The tribunal directed the applicant to pre-deposit 50% of the tax demanded, subject to verification of the previously claimed deposit amount. Failure to confirm the initial deposit would require the applicant to pre-deposit the entire tax amount. The tribunal noted the argument that the tax demand was time-barred, indicating it would be examined separately during the appeal proceedings. The lack of proof of tax payment and supporting documents led to instructions for verification by the jurisdictional officer. Compliance with the pre-deposit requirement within six weeks would result in the balance amount being waived, with recovery stayed during the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 06:17:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 413 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243816</link>
      <description>The tribunal directed the applicant to pre-deposit 50% of the tax demanded, subject to verification of the previously claimed deposit amount. Failure to confirm the initial deposit would require the applicant to pre-deposit the entire tax amount. The tribunal noted the argument that the tax demand was time-barred, indicating it would be examined separately during the appeal proceedings. The lack of proof of tax payment and supporting documents led to instructions for verification by the jurisdictional officer. Compliance with the pre-deposit requirement within six weeks would result in the balance amount being waived, with recovery stayed during the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>