<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 412 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243815</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the applicant to deposit Rs.10,00,000/- within six weeks due to a calculation error in demand quantification. Upon compliance, the remaining tax, interest, and penalties would be waived, with recovery stayed during the appeal. The decision highlighted the need to review a previous order during the appeal hearing, ensuring a fair resolution based on legal precedents and arguments presented by both parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2014 18:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 412 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243815</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the applicant to deposit Rs.10,00,000/- within six weeks due to a calculation error in demand quantification. Upon compliance, the remaining tax, interest, and penalties would be waived, with recovery stayed during the appeal. The decision highlighted the need to review a previous order during the appeal hearing, ensuring a fair resolution based on legal precedents and arguments presented by both parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>