https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243799 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a cement manufacturing company, in a case concerning duty exemption under specific notifications. The dispute arose from the appellant exceeding the exemption limit and short paying duty, leading to a demand of Rs. 95,55,323. The Tribunal found that the duty demand was time-barred as there was no evidence of deliberate intent to evade duty. The order was set aside, emphasizing the importance of compliance, transparency, and effective communication with authorities in excise duty matters. en-us Thu, 21 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Jun 2015 13:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243799 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a cement manufacturing company, in a case concerning duty exemption under specific notifications. The dispute arose from the appellant exceeding the exemption limit and short paying duty, leading to a demand of Rs. 95,55,323. The Tribunal found that the duty demand was time-barred as there was no evidence of deliberate intent to evade duty. The order was set aside, emphasizing the importance of compliance, transparency, and effective communication with authorities in excise duty matters. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 21 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243799