<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 379 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243782</link>
    <description>Where tax on royalty or similar income is computed under the India-US DTAA, the treaty rate is treated as the governing rate and education cess and secondary and higher education cess cannot be levied separately. The Tribunal followed its earlier view that tax determined under Article 12 is inclusive of surcharge and cess, so the additional cess levy was not sustainable. The issue was therefore decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 379 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243782</link>
      <description>Where tax on royalty or similar income is computed under the India-US DTAA, the treaty rate is treated as the governing rate and education cess and secondary and higher education cess cannot be levied separately. The Tribunal followed its earlier view that tax determined under Article 12 is inclusive of surcharge and cess, so the additional cess levy was not sustainable. The issue was therefore decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243782</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>