<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 378 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243781</link>
    <description>The court affirmed the disallowance of Rs. 1,64,87,375/- as a contingent liability, not deductible, and ruled that Section 43B did not apply as the liability was contractual, not statutory. The court allowed the deduction for foreign exchange fluctuation loss, in favor of the assessee. The appeal was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 18:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 378 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243781</link>
      <description>The court affirmed the disallowance of Rs. 1,64,87,375/- as a contingent liability, not deductible, and ruled that Section 43B did not apply as the liability was contractual, not statutory. The court allowed the deduction for foreign exchange fluctuation loss, in favor of the assessee. The appeal was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>