<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 369 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243772</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made by the AO, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirming the deletion of the disallowance of interest under section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that all conditions of the section were met, and the AO lacked sufficient documentary evidence to justify the disallowance, leading to the decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2014 07:54:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 369 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243772</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made by the AO, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirming the deletion of the disallowance of interest under section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that all conditions of the section were met, and the AO lacked sufficient documentary evidence to justify the disallowance, leading to the decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>