<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 365 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243768</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the deletion of mark-to-market loss claimed on derivative transactions, allowing the deduction based on established legal principles and consistent judicial interpretations. However, the Tribunal sided with the Revenue on the consideration of interest income on Fixed Deposit Receipts (FDRs) for deduction under section 80IB, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and emphasizing the requirement of a direct nexus with the industrial undertaking as per Supreme Court precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 365 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243768</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the deletion of mark-to-market loss claimed on derivative transactions, allowing the deduction based on established legal principles and consistent judicial interpretations. However, the Tribunal sided with the Revenue on the consideration of interest income on Fixed Deposit Receipts (FDRs) for deduction under section 80IB, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and emphasizing the requirement of a direct nexus with the industrial undertaking as per Supreme Court precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>