<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 358 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243761</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to rectify errors in an order concerning the application of Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the rectification was based on debatable issues rather than obvious mistakes, emphasizing the importance of clarity and non-debatable nature of errors for effective rectification. The appeal was allowed in part, underscoring the necessity of adhering to established legal standards in rectifying judicial orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2014 07:53:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345395" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 358 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243761</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to rectify errors in an order concerning the application of Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the rectification was based on debatable issues rather than obvious mistakes, emphasizing the importance of clarity and non-debatable nature of errors for effective rectification. The appeal was allowed in part, underscoring the necessity of adhering to established legal standards in rectifying judicial orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>