<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 354 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243757</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the reversal of CENVAT credit on inputs written off in the Books of Accounts. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals), emphasizing that as long as the inputs were still present in the factory premises, the credit availed on those inputs did not need to be reversed, even if they were previously declared obsolete. The closure of the factory did not alter this conclusion, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2014 07:53:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 354 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243757</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the reversal of CENVAT credit on inputs written off in the Books of Accounts. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals), emphasizing that as long as the inputs were still present in the factory premises, the credit availed on those inputs did not need to be reversed, even if they were previously declared obsolete. The closure of the factory did not alter this conclusion, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243757</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>