<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 623 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161856</link>
    <description>The repeal of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 by the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 did not extinguish liabilities, penalties, or proceedings arising under the old Act because section 80 preserved prior operation and section 80(3) applied the general saving clause in the Andhra Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1891. That saving provision allowed liabilities and legal proceedings in respect of matters under the repealed Act to be instituted, continued, or enforced as if the repealing Act had not been passed. Penalty proceedings for liabilities incurred under the repealed Act were therefore validly commenced after repeal and remained within jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 17:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 623 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161856</link>
      <description>The repeal of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 by the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 did not extinguish liabilities, penalties, or proceedings arising under the old Act because section 80 preserved prior operation and section 80(3) applied the general saving clause in the Andhra Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1891. That saving provision allowed liabilities and legal proceedings in respect of matters under the repealed Act to be instituted, continued, or enforced as if the repealing Act had not been passed. Penalty proceedings for liabilities incurred under the repealed Act were therefore validly commenced after repeal and remained within jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>