<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 725 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161854</link>
    <description>Seizure of a tea consignment under sales tax law was stated to depend on more than an incomplete road challan: where invoices and other supporting papers were produced within time, the authority had to make a reasoned enquiry before treating them as fabricated. The note states that mere incompleteness of the transport document, without a prescribed form and without evidence of fabrication or intention to evade tax, could not justify seizure or penalty. It further indicates that coercive action and penalty require objective satisfaction based on proper enquiry, and that the Tribunal ought to address any failure in that process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2014 12:40:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 725 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161854</link>
      <description>Seizure of a tea consignment under sales tax law was stated to depend on more than an incomplete road challan: where invoices and other supporting papers were produced within time, the authority had to make a reasoned enquiry before treating them as fabricated. The note states that mere incompleteness of the transport document, without a prescribed form and without evidence of fabrication or intention to evade tax, could not justify seizure or penalty. It further indicates that coercive action and penalty require objective satisfaction based on proper enquiry, and that the Tribunal ought to address any failure in that process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>