<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 634 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161836</link>
    <description>Reassessment under section 19 of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act could not be initiated where the turnover had been fully disclosed in the returns and examined in the original assessment. The Court held that &quot;escaped assessment&quot; applies to turnover not noticed because of inadvertence or concealment, not to the same disclosed material later revisited on a different view. A flying squad report alone was insufficient to reopen the assessment, and the reassessment could not be used to correct an alleged mistake or replace the earlier view. The reassessment order and additional demand were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:47:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 634 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161836</link>
      <description>Reassessment under section 19 of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act could not be initiated where the turnover had been fully disclosed in the returns and examined in the original assessment. The Court held that &quot;escaped assessment&quot; applies to turnover not noticed because of inadvertence or concealment, not to the same disclosed material later revisited on a different view. A flying squad report alone was insufficient to reopen the assessment, and the reassessment could not be used to correct an alleged mistake or replace the earlier view. The reassessment order and additional demand were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>