<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 1132 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161822</link>
    <description>Interest on refundable sales tax deposits under section 14-C was to be computed by reading the court&#039;s directions with the governing statutory refund scheme. For the first deposit of Rs. 50,00,000, the earlier order required interest from the date of deposit, so the pre-amendment statutory rates of 18% for the first ninety days and 24% thereafter applied from that date. For the further deposit of Rs. 25,00,000, the later order contained no specific commencement direction, so interest ran from the date of the refund application at the same statutory rates. The refundable deposits therefore had to be recalculated accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 14:33:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 1132 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161822</link>
      <description>Interest on refundable sales tax deposits under section 14-C was to be computed by reading the court&#039;s directions with the governing statutory refund scheme. For the first deposit of Rs. 50,00,000, the earlier order required interest from the date of deposit, so the pre-amendment statutory rates of 18% for the first ninety days and 24% thereafter applied from that date. For the further deposit of Rs. 25,00,000, the later order contained no specific commencement direction, so interest ran from the date of the refund application at the same statutory rates. The refundable deposits therefore had to be recalculated accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>