<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 320 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243722</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer regarding the under-valuation of closing stock of land for the assessment year 2006-07. The legal dispute with M/s Amritsar Rayon &amp;amp; Silk Mills (P) Limited had a substantial impact on the valuation, justifying the reduction in value by the assessee. The Court found the valuation method consistent and ruled that no loss to the revenue was caused by the adjustments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 320 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243722</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer regarding the under-valuation of closing stock of land for the assessment year 2006-07. The legal dispute with M/s Amritsar Rayon &amp;amp; Silk Mills (P) Limited had a substantial impact on the valuation, justifying the reduction in value by the assessee. The Court found the valuation method consistent and ruled that no loss to the revenue was caused by the adjustments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>