<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 319 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243721</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the application of 8% gross profit by the CIT (Appeal) and Tribunal was not legally justified as no valid reasons or material were provided. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the orders of the Tribunal, CIT Commissioner (Appeal), and Assessing Officer regarding the estimation of gross profit for the relevant year. The Assessing Officer was directed to pass consequential orders accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2014 12:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 319 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243721</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the application of 8% gross profit by the CIT (Appeal) and Tribunal was not legally justified as no valid reasons or material were provided. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the orders of the Tribunal, CIT Commissioner (Appeal), and Assessing Officer regarding the estimation of gross profit for the relevant year. The Assessing Officer was directed to pass consequential orders accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>