<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 313 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243715</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, as the assessee did not conceal income or furnish inaccurate particulars. The tribunal found that the claims were based on a consistent accounting method disclosed in the return of income. The tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT (A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2014 10:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 313 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243715</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, as the assessee did not conceal income or furnish inaccurate particulars. The tribunal found that the claims were based on a consistent accounting method disclosed in the return of income. The tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT (A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>