<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 311 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243713</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by deleting additions of Rs. 7,50,000 out of Rs. 10,00,000 under Section 68 related to loans, reducing the disallowance of cash expenses to Rs. 50,000, and addressing interest and penalty issues as per the law. The Tribunal found the initiation of penalty proceedings premature and rejected it, clarifying that the assessee could contest any penalty imposed according to the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2014 12:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 311 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243713</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by deleting additions of Rs. 7,50,000 out of Rs. 10,00,000 under Section 68 related to loans, reducing the disallowance of cash expenses to Rs. 50,000, and addressing interest and penalty issues as per the law. The Tribunal found the initiation of penalty proceedings premature and rejected it, clarifying that the assessee could contest any penalty imposed according to the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>