<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 303 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243705</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeals for both assessment years, affirming the eligibility of the assessee for deduction u/s 80IB(10) based on previous rulings and interpretations. The orders of the ld. CIT(A) were upheld, emphasizing the importance of considering project approval dates and extended filing periods in determining the applicability of deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2014 12:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 303 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243705</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeals for both assessment years, affirming the eligibility of the assessee for deduction u/s 80IB(10) based on previous rulings and interpretations. The orders of the ld. CIT(A) were upheld, emphasizing the importance of considering project approval dates and extended filing periods in determining the applicability of deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>