<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 292 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243694</link>
    <description>The tribunal granted the Commissioner of Service Tax Chennai&#039;s request for a jurisdictional change in the appeal. The case involved a tax dispute over commercial and industrial construction services, leading to significant demands and penalties for non-payment of tax liabilities. Separate analysis was conducted for the Jayanth Tech Park Project and the Swarup Heritage Project due to differing circumstances. The tribunal considered arguments on service tax applicability, payment timing, abatement benefits, and directed the appellant to make a specific deposit, waived a portion for appeal admission, and stayed the collection of remaining dues during the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 15:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 292 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243694</link>
      <description>The tribunal granted the Commissioner of Service Tax Chennai&#039;s request for a jurisdictional change in the appeal. The case involved a tax dispute over commercial and industrial construction services, leading to significant demands and penalties for non-payment of tax liabilities. Separate analysis was conducted for the Jayanth Tech Park Project and the Swarup Heritage Project due to differing circumstances. The tribunal considered arguments on service tax applicability, payment timing, abatement benefits, and directed the appellant to make a specific deposit, waived a portion for appeal admission, and stayed the collection of remaining dues during the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>