https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243685 The Court remitted the matter back to CESTAT for determining compliance with pre-deposit requirements, quashing the orders dated 14-5-2012 and 6-9-2012. The petitioner was directed to appear before CESTAT with a certified copy of the order for compliance assessment, and no coercive action was to be taken until resolution by CESTAT. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions, emphasizing the importance of meaningful opportunities before appeal dismissal and ensuring adherence to legal requirements. en-us Mon, 07 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Feb 2014 20:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243685 The Court remitted the matter back to CESTAT for determining compliance with pre-deposit requirements, quashing the orders dated 14-5-2012 and 6-9-2012. The petitioner was directed to appear before CESTAT with a certified copy of the order for compliance assessment, and no coercive action was to be taken until resolution by CESTAT. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions, emphasizing the importance of meaningful opportunities before appeal dismissal and ensuring adherence to legal requirements. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 07 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243685