<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 280 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243682</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on furnace oil used to generate electricity is admissible only to the extent the electricity is consumed within the factory for manufacture or other in-factory purposes. Where surplus electricity is wheeled out to other units, the nexus between the input and manufacture is broken and credit is not available for that portion. Applying the controlling Supreme Court principle, the matter required reconsideration because the Tribunal had not addressed the distinction between captive use and external supply. The issue was answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue, with remand for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 19:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 280 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243682</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on furnace oil used to generate electricity is admissible only to the extent the electricity is consumed within the factory for manufacture or other in-factory purposes. Where surplus electricity is wheeled out to other units, the nexus between the input and manufacture is broken and credit is not available for that portion. Applying the controlling Supreme Court principle, the matter required reconsideration because the Tribunal had not addressed the distinction between captive use and external supply. The issue was answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue, with remand for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>