<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 276 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243678</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, ruling that no penalty was justified against the Appellant. It clarified that interest is applicable when credit is erroneously taken or utilized, as per Section 11AB, citing the Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation in UOI Vs. Ind -Swift Laboratories Ltd. The judgment emphasized adherence to the Court&#039;s interpretation in such matters, focusing on the recovery of credit along with interest under Rule 14 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 15:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 276 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243678</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, ruling that no penalty was justified against the Appellant. It clarified that interest is applicable when credit is erroneously taken or utilized, as per Section 11AB, citing the Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation in UOI Vs. Ind -Swift Laboratories Ltd. The judgment emphasized adherence to the Court&#039;s interpretation in such matters, focusing on the recovery of credit along with interest under Rule 14 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>