<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 275 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243677</link>
    <description>Escort charges and charges for supervision of erection and commissioning incurred after clearance of goods are not includible in the assessable value. The Tribunal treated the issue as settled by prior precedent and applied that rule to exclude post-clearance charges from valuation. The Revenue&#039;s challenge was therefore rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 19:24:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345231" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 275 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243677</link>
      <description>Escort charges and charges for supervision of erection and commissioning incurred after clearance of goods are not includible in the assessable value. The Tribunal treated the issue as settled by prior precedent and applied that rule to exclude post-clearance charges from valuation. The Revenue&#039;s challenge was therefore rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>