<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 272 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243674</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals, ruling in favor of the assessee on the issues of interest on securities, entertainment expenses, loss on unmatured foreign exchange contracts, and bad debt claims. However, the disallowance of depreciation on leased assets was upheld. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s orders on several issues, providing relief to the assessee in those specific matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 19:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 272 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243674</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals, ruling in favor of the assessee on the issues of interest on securities, entertainment expenses, loss on unmatured foreign exchange contracts, and bad debt claims. However, the disallowance of depreciation on leased assets was upheld. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s orders on several issues, providing relief to the assessee in those specific matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243674</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>