<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 266 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243667</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of both disputed additions under sections 69 and 68 of the Act. Grounds 3, 4, and 5 were deemed general and did not require separate consideration. The judgment emphasized the significance of substantiated evidence in tax assessments and upheld the burden of proof principles for establishing transaction legitimacy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 13:14:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 266 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243667</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of both disputed additions under sections 69 and 68 of the Act. Grounds 3, 4, and 5 were deemed general and did not require separate consideration. The judgment emphasized the significance of substantiated evidence in tax assessments and upheld the burden of proof principles for establishing transaction legitimacy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243667</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>