<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 261 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243662</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee by deleting the addition of Rs. 30 lacs under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act. It found that the assessee adequately explained the source of the deposit, proving the genuineness of the transaction and the creditworthiness of the purchasers. The Tribunal overturned the lower authorities&#039; decisions, emphasizing the satisfactory explanation provided by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 13:14:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345197" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 261 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243662</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee by deleting the addition of Rs. 30 lacs under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act. It found that the assessee adequately explained the source of the deposit, proving the genuineness of the transaction and the creditworthiness of the purchasers. The Tribunal overturned the lower authorities&#039; decisions, emphasizing the satisfactory explanation provided by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>