<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 781 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161816</link>
    <description>A T.V. antenna was treated as an accessory, not an inseparable component of a T.V. set, because it did not form an essential integral part of the set&#039;s basic use and only improved reception and picture clarity. On that basis, the applicable sales tax notifications were applied to the antenna as an accessory, and the levy at six per cent was upheld as valid. The challenge based on an earlier discriminatory notification did not affect the assessments, since they were governed by the later notification regime.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:50:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345185" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 781 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161816</link>
      <description>A T.V. antenna was treated as an accessory, not an inseparable component of a T.V. set, because it did not form an essential integral part of the set&#039;s basic use and only improved reception and picture clarity. On that basis, the applicable sales tax notifications were applied to the antenna as an accessory, and the levy at six per cent was upheld as valid. The challenge based on an earlier discriminatory notification did not affect the assessments, since they were governed by the later notification regime.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>