<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 1010 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161812</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an assessment order based on estimation, upholding the reassessment directed by the appellate authority. The Court found the revisional authority&#039;s methodology justified and concluded that there was no need for its appellate jurisdiction. The appeal was deemed unsuccessful, with no order as to costs, affirming the decisions of the lower authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:35:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 1010 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161812</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an assessment order based on estimation, upholding the reassessment directed by the appellate authority. The Court found the revisional authority&#039;s methodology justified and concluded that there was no need for its appellate jurisdiction. The appeal was deemed unsuccessful, with no order as to costs, affirming the decisions of the lower authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161812</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>